Every time I turn around they're leaving the kitchen due to heat issues. Here is his last comment:
My comment back on his blog:
Wow, ok, thought I had to be wrong in what it looked like but I wasn't.
Once again, Barefoot, you can dish it out as they say...your rules simply do not apply to you
Your last comment is back on track, but in your previous ones I have been called a liar, a dishonest intellectual, spoiled, illiterate child -- did I miss anything?
What I did not get, however, was an answer.
When you name call and accuse me of acting a certain way in my comments, don't forget that my "comments" are right there for everyone to see and read. And, when they do not seem presented any different than your own -- people are going to wonder what in the world you're talking about with all the paranoia. You risk losing credibility and appearing as though you just don't have an answer.
I have thoroughly enjoyed the debate thus far other than this bizarre, selective overreactiing
Do you not see why I said what I did about the defensiveness?
As for your staying on topic request, I've posted 2 lengthy answers to your comments on time and chance. And sent all my readers there (of the ones who want to continue this discussion) The one about time is already up at, www.pastorrobsrants.blogspot.com and the one about chance will be added tomorrow.
I'm sure people would love to hear your responses, Larry, but, to be honest with you 100 percent of the emails and comment feedback from my blog (as far as attitude goes) has been about the love and patience shown you despite the condescending approach you may not even be aware you take.
Again, I'd love to hear your responses but I'm not going to play this childish game with you.
This is your last warning.
Just kidding...
I'll give you 2 more cause I'm trying to be nice.
At this point let me share with you all (the readers) a curious reaction I witness time and time again when more than adequately qualified individuals break from the (your) party line...
This is called the fallacy of poisoning the well.
Yet again you abuse my hospitality and the platform (by pointing out error?) I have offered you for your remarks with intellectual dishonesty. (most people refer to them as facts)
This is your last warning. If you want to discuss the substantive issues, and you're capable of showing the respect in my venue that I've shown in yours (I would have been kicked out long ago if I actually mirrored the so-called 'respect' he shows) you're welcome to do so.
However, if you continue to act like a spoiled, illiterate child (i.e. like him), I see no reason to continue to publish your remarks.
Do I make myself clear (yes dad)?